identity: wire refresh into oauth + e2e flow tests (Phase 2 complete, +3 tests)
Some checks failed
Test, Build, and Deploy / test-build-deploy (push) Failing after 53s
Some checks failed
Test, Build, and Deploy / test-build-deploy (push) Failing after 53s
exchange now issues an access+refresh pair (RFC 6749 §4.1.4/§5.1) via token.sx issue_grant; added the refresh grant (§6) delegating to token rotation. End-to-end: code-exchange → refresh → introspect (active), refresh-token reuse rejected (invalid_grant), and revoke-then-refresh blocked by grant cascade. oauth 17/17, 65/65. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,12 +1,14 @@
|
||||
;; identity/oauth.sx — the OAuth2 authorization-code flow as a message
|
||||
;; protocol (RFC 6749 §4.1), with PKCE (RFC 7636, `plain` method).
|
||||
;; protocol (RFC 6749 §4.1), with PKCE (RFC 7636, `plain` method) and the
|
||||
;; refresh-token grant (RFC 6749 §6).
|
||||
;;
|
||||
;; The flow is a state machine threaded through one authorization-server
|
||||
;; process, never a single function:
|
||||
;;
|
||||
;; authorize -> {consent_required, ReqId} (§4.1.1 request stored)
|
||||
;; consent -> {code, Code} | {error, access_denied} (§4.1.2 grant/deny)
|
||||
;; exchange -> {ok, Token} | {error, invalid_grant} (§4.1.3 / §5.2)
|
||||
;; exchange -> {ok, Access, Refresh} | {error, invalid_grant} (§4.1.3/§5.1)
|
||||
;; refresh -> {ok, Access, Refresh} | {error, invalid_grant} (§6)
|
||||
;;
|
||||
;; Security invariants enforced at exchange (§4.1.3, §10.5):
|
||||
;; - the code is single-use: it is removed on the FIRST exchange attempt,
|
||||
@@ -16,13 +18,14 @@
|
||||
;; - PKCE: the presented verifier must match the stored challenge
|
||||
;; (plain method: challenge == verifier), else invalid_grant.
|
||||
;;
|
||||
;; On success a token is issued into a grant-backed table (token.sx), so
|
||||
;; revocation stays real. The server proves identity; it does not decide
|
||||
;; Tokens are grant-backed (token.sx): exchange issues an access+refresh
|
||||
;; pair, refresh rotates it, and revoking any token cascades to the grant —
|
||||
;; so revocation is real. The server proves identity; it does not decide
|
||||
;; permission — that is acl's job, keyed off the issued grant.
|
||||
|
||||
(define
|
||||
identity-oauth-source
|
||||
"-module(identity_oauth).\n\n start() ->\n spawn(fun () ->\n TokReg = identity_tokens:start(),\n loop(TokReg, [], [])\n end).\n\n authorize(O, ClientId, RedirectUri, Scope, Subject, Challenge) ->\n O ! {authorize, ClientId, RedirectUri, Scope, Subject, Challenge, self()},\n receive {oauth_reply, R} -> R end.\n\n consent(O, ReqId, Decision) ->\n O ! {consent, ReqId, Decision, self()},\n receive {oauth_reply, R} -> R end.\n\n exchange(O, Code, ClientId, RedirectUri, Verifier) ->\n O ! {exchange, Code, ClientId, RedirectUri, Verifier, self()},\n receive {oauth_reply, R} -> R end.\n\n introspect(O, Token) ->\n O ! {introspect, Token, self()},\n receive {oauth_reply, R} -> R end.\n\n revoke(O, Token) ->\n O ! {revoke, Token, self()},\n receive {oauth_reply, R} -> R end.\n\n loop(TokReg, Pending, Codes) ->\n receive\n {authorize, ClientId, RedirectUri, Scope, Subject, Challenge, From} ->\n ReqId = make_ref(),\n Rec = {ClientId, RedirectUri, Scope, Subject, Challenge},\n From ! {oauth_reply, {consent_required, ReqId}},\n loop(TokReg, [{ReqId, Rec} | Pending], Codes);\n {consent, ReqId, Decision, From} ->\n case find(ReqId, Pending) of\n none ->\n From ! {oauth_reply, {error, unknown_request}},\n loop(TokReg, Pending, Codes);\n {ok, Rec} ->\n Pending2 = remove(ReqId, Pending),\n case Decision of\n allow ->\n Code = make_ref(),\n From ! {oauth_reply, {code, Code}},\n loop(TokReg, Pending2, [{Code, Rec} | Codes]);\n deny ->\n From ! {oauth_reply, {error, access_denied}},\n loop(TokReg, Pending2, Codes)\n end\n end;\n {exchange, Code, ClientId, RedirectUri, Verifier, From} ->\n case find(Code, Codes) of\n none ->\n From ! {oauth_reply, {error, invalid_grant}},\n loop(TokReg, Pending, Codes);\n {ok, Rec} ->\n Codes2 = remove(Code, Codes),\n From ! {oauth_reply, redeem(TokReg, Rec, ClientId, RedirectUri, Verifier)},\n loop(TokReg, Pending, Codes2)\n end;\n {introspect, Token, From} ->\n From ! {oauth_reply, identity_tokens:introspect(TokReg, Token)},\n loop(TokReg, Pending, Codes);\n {revoke, Token, From} ->\n identity_tokens:revoke(TokReg, Token),\n From ! {oauth_reply, ok},\n loop(TokReg, Pending, Codes)\n end.\n\n redeem(TokReg, {CCid, CRedir, Scope, Subject, Challenge}, ClientId, RedirectUri, Verifier) ->\n case CCid =:= ClientId of\n false -> {error, invalid_grant};\n true ->\n case CRedir =:= RedirectUri of\n false -> {error, invalid_grant};\n true ->\n case Challenge =:= Verifier of\n false -> {error, invalid_grant};\n true ->\n {ok, Token} = identity_tokens:issue(TokReg, Subject, ClientId, Scope),\n {ok, Token}\n end\n end\n end.\n\n find(_, []) -> none;\n find(Key, [{K, Rec} | Rest]) ->\n case K =:= Key of\n true -> {ok, Rec};\n false -> find(Key, Rest)\n end.\n\n remove(_, []) -> [];\n remove(Key, [{K, Rec} | Rest]) ->\n case K =:= Key of\n true -> remove(Key, Rest);\n false -> [{K, Rec} | remove(Key, Rest)]\n end.")
|
||||
"-module(identity_oauth).\n\n start() ->\n spawn(fun () ->\n TokReg = identity_tokens:start(),\n loop(TokReg, [], [])\n end).\n\n authorize(O, ClientId, RedirectUri, Scope, Subject, Challenge) ->\n O ! {authorize, ClientId, RedirectUri, Scope, Subject, Challenge, self()},\n receive {oauth_reply, R} -> R end.\n\n consent(O, ReqId, Decision) ->\n O ! {consent, ReqId, Decision, self()},\n receive {oauth_reply, R} -> R end.\n\n exchange(O, Code, ClientId, RedirectUri, Verifier) ->\n O ! {exchange, Code, ClientId, RedirectUri, Verifier, self()},\n receive {oauth_reply, R} -> R end.\n\n refresh(O, RefreshTok) ->\n O ! {refresh, RefreshTok, self()},\n receive {oauth_reply, R} -> R end.\n\n introspect(O, Token) ->\n O ! {introspect, Token, self()},\n receive {oauth_reply, R} -> R end.\n\n revoke(O, Token) ->\n O ! {revoke, Token, self()},\n receive {oauth_reply, R} -> R end.\n\n loop(TokReg, Pending, Codes) ->\n receive\n {authorize, ClientId, RedirectUri, Scope, Subject, Challenge, From} ->\n ReqId = make_ref(),\n Rec = {ClientId, RedirectUri, Scope, Subject, Challenge},\n From ! {oauth_reply, {consent_required, ReqId}},\n loop(TokReg, [{ReqId, Rec} | Pending], Codes);\n {consent, ReqId, Decision, From} ->\n case find(ReqId, Pending) of\n none ->\n From ! {oauth_reply, {error, unknown_request}},\n loop(TokReg, Pending, Codes);\n {ok, Rec} ->\n Pending2 = remove(ReqId, Pending),\n case Decision of\n allow ->\n Code = make_ref(),\n From ! {oauth_reply, {code, Code}},\n loop(TokReg, Pending2, [{Code, Rec} | Codes]);\n deny ->\n From ! {oauth_reply, {error, access_denied}},\n loop(TokReg, Pending2, Codes)\n end\n end;\n {exchange, Code, ClientId, RedirectUri, Verifier, From} ->\n case find(Code, Codes) of\n none ->\n From ! {oauth_reply, {error, invalid_grant}},\n loop(TokReg, Pending, Codes);\n {ok, Rec} ->\n Codes2 = remove(Code, Codes),\n From ! {oauth_reply, redeem(TokReg, Rec, ClientId, RedirectUri, Verifier)},\n loop(TokReg, Pending, Codes2)\n end;\n {refresh, RTok, From} ->\n From ! {oauth_reply, identity_tokens:refresh(TokReg, RTok)},\n loop(TokReg, Pending, Codes);\n {introspect, Token, From} ->\n From ! {oauth_reply, identity_tokens:introspect(TokReg, Token)},\n loop(TokReg, Pending, Codes);\n {revoke, Token, From} ->\n identity_tokens:revoke(TokReg, Token),\n From ! {oauth_reply, ok},\n loop(TokReg, Pending, Codes)\n end.\n\n redeem(TokReg, {CCid, CRedir, Scope, Subject, Challenge}, ClientId, RedirectUri, Verifier) ->\n case CCid =:= ClientId of\n false -> {error, invalid_grant};\n true ->\n case CRedir =:= RedirectUri of\n false -> {error, invalid_grant};\n true ->\n case Challenge =:= Verifier of\n false -> {error, invalid_grant};\n true -> identity_tokens:issue_grant(TokReg, Subject, ClientId, Scope)\n end\n end\n end.\n\n find(_, []) -> none;\n find(Key, [{K, Rec} | Rest]) ->\n case K =:= Key of\n true -> {ok, Rec};\n false -> find(Key, Rest)\n end.\n\n remove(_, []) -> [];\n remove(Key, [{K, Rec} | Rest]) ->\n case K =:= Key of\n true -> remove(Key, Rest);\n false -> [{K, Rec} | remove(Key, Rest)]\n end.")
|
||||
|
||||
(define
|
||||
identity-load-oauth!
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"language": "identity",
|
||||
"total_pass": 62,
|
||||
"total": 62,
|
||||
"total_pass": 65,
|
||||
"total": 65,
|
||||
"suites": [
|
||||
{"name":"session","pass":11,"total":11,"status":"ok"},
|
||||
{"name":"token","pass":18,"total":18,"status":"ok"},
|
||||
{"name":"registry","pass":9,"total":9,"status":"ok"},
|
||||
{"name":"api","pass":10,"total":10,"status":"ok"},
|
||||
{"name":"oauth","pass":14,"total":14,"status":"ok"}
|
||||
{"name":"oauth","pass":17,"total":17,"status":"ok"}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# identity-on-sx Scoreboard
|
||||
|
||||
**Total: 62 / 62 tests passing**
|
||||
**Total: 65 / 65 tests passing**
|
||||
|
||||
| | Suite | Pass | Total |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
|
||||
| ✅ | token | 18 | 18 |
|
||||
| ✅ | registry | 9 | 9 |
|
||||
| ✅ | api | 10 | 10 |
|
||||
| ✅ | oauth | 14 | 14 |
|
||||
| ✅ | oauth | 17 | 17 |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Generated by `lib/identity/conformance.sh`.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
|
||||
;; identity/tests/oauth.sx — OAuth2 authorization-code flow (RFC 6749
|
||||
;; §4.1) + PKCE (RFC 7636). Covers the full happy path and every
|
||||
;; rejection: denied consent, single-use codes, client/redirect binding,
|
||||
;; PKCE verifier mismatch, unknown code/request, and real revocation of
|
||||
;; an exchanged token.
|
||||
;; §4.1) + PKCE (RFC 7636) + refresh grant (§6). Covers the full happy
|
||||
;; path end-to-end (code exchange → access+refresh → refresh rotation) and
|
||||
;; every rejection: denied consent, single-use codes, client/redirect
|
||||
;; binding, PKCE mismatch, unknown code/request, refresh-token reuse, and
|
||||
;; revoke-then-use (which must fail).
|
||||
|
||||
(define id-oauth-test-count 0)
|
||||
(define id-oauth-test-pass 0)
|
||||
@@ -44,12 +45,12 @@
|
||||
"issued")
|
||||
|
||||
(id-oauth-test
|
||||
"exchanged token introspects active"
|
||||
"exchanged access token introspects active"
|
||||
(idonm
|
||||
(ido-ev
|
||||
(str
|
||||
ido-granted
|
||||
", {ok, Tok} = identity_oauth:exchange(O, Code, webapp, uri1, verif1),\n case identity_oauth:introspect(O, Tok) of\n {active, _, _, _} -> active;\n {inactive} -> inactive\n end")))
|
||||
", {ok, Tok, _R} = identity_oauth:exchange(O, Code, webapp, uri1, verif1),\n case identity_oauth:introspect(O, Tok) of\n {active, _, _, _} -> active;\n {inactive} -> inactive\n end")))
|
||||
"active")
|
||||
|
||||
(id-oauth-test
|
||||
@@ -58,7 +59,7 @@
|
||||
(ido-ev
|
||||
(str
|
||||
ido-granted
|
||||
", {ok, Tok} = identity_oauth:exchange(O, Code, webapp, uri1, verif1),\n case identity_oauth:introspect(O, Tok) of\n {active, Subject, _, _} -> Subject\n end")))
|
||||
", {ok, Tok, _R} = identity_oauth:exchange(O, Code, webapp, uri1, verif1),\n case identity_oauth:introspect(O, Tok) of\n {active, Subject, _, _} -> Subject\n end")))
|
||||
"alice")
|
||||
|
||||
(id-oauth-test
|
||||
@@ -67,9 +68,29 @@
|
||||
(ido-ev
|
||||
(str
|
||||
ido-granted
|
||||
", {ok, Tok} = identity_oauth:exchange(O, Code, webapp, uri1, verif1),\n case identity_oauth:introspect(O, Tok) of\n {active, _, _, Scope} -> Scope\n end")))
|
||||
", {ok, Tok, _R} = identity_oauth:exchange(O, Code, webapp, uri1, verif1),\n case identity_oauth:introspect(O, Tok) of\n {active, _, _, Scope} -> Scope\n end")))
|
||||
"read")
|
||||
|
||||
;; ── refresh grant (RFC 6749 §6) end-to-end ───────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
(id-oauth-test
|
||||
"refresh after exchange yields a working access token"
|
||||
(idonm
|
||||
(ido-ev
|
||||
(str
|
||||
ido-granted
|
||||
", {ok, _A, R} = identity_oauth:exchange(O, Code, webapp, uri1, verif1),\n {ok, A2, _R2} = identity_oauth:refresh(O, R),\n case identity_oauth:introspect(O, A2) of\n {active, _, _, _} -> active;\n {inactive} -> inactive\n end")))
|
||||
"active")
|
||||
|
||||
(id-oauth-test
|
||||
"reusing a rotated refresh token is invalid_grant"
|
||||
(idonm
|
||||
(ido-ev
|
||||
(str
|
||||
ido-granted
|
||||
", {ok, _A, R} = identity_oauth:exchange(O, Code, webapp, uri1, verif1),\n {ok, _A2, _R2} = identity_oauth:refresh(O, R),\n case identity_oauth:refresh(O, R) of\n {ok, _, _} -> rotated;\n {error, Why} -> Why\n end")))
|
||||
"invalid_grant")
|
||||
|
||||
;; ── consent denied (§4.1.2.1) ────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
(id-oauth-test
|
||||
@@ -87,7 +108,7 @@
|
||||
(ido-ev
|
||||
(str
|
||||
ido-granted
|
||||
", identity_oauth:exchange(O, Code, webapp, uri1, verif1),\n case identity_oauth:exchange(O, Code, webapp, uri1, verif1) of\n {ok, _} -> replayed;\n {error, Why} -> Why\n end")))
|
||||
", identity_oauth:exchange(O, Code, webapp, uri1, verif1),\n case identity_oauth:exchange(O, Code, webapp, uri1, verif1) of\n {ok, _, _} -> replayed;\n {error, Why} -> Why\n end")))
|
||||
"invalid_grant")
|
||||
|
||||
;; ── code binding to client + redirect_uri (§4.1.3) ───────────────
|
||||
@@ -98,7 +119,7 @@
|
||||
(ido-ev
|
||||
(str
|
||||
ido-granted
|
||||
", case identity_oauth:exchange(O, Code, attacker, uri1, verif1) of\n {ok, _} -> ok;\n {error, Why} -> Why\n end")))
|
||||
", case identity_oauth:exchange(O, Code, attacker, uri1, verif1) of\n {ok, _, _} -> ok;\n {error, Why} -> Why\n end")))
|
||||
"invalid_grant")
|
||||
|
||||
(id-oauth-test
|
||||
@@ -107,7 +128,7 @@
|
||||
(ido-ev
|
||||
(str
|
||||
ido-granted
|
||||
", case identity_oauth:exchange(O, Code, webapp, evil_uri, verif1) of\n {ok, _} -> ok;\n {error, Why} -> Why\n end")))
|
||||
", case identity_oauth:exchange(O, Code, webapp, evil_uri, verif1) of\n {ok, _, _} -> ok;\n {error, Why} -> Why\n end")))
|
||||
"invalid_grant")
|
||||
|
||||
;; ── PKCE verifier mismatch (RFC 7636) ────────────────────────────
|
||||
@@ -118,7 +139,7 @@
|
||||
(ido-ev
|
||||
(str
|
||||
ido-granted
|
||||
", case identity_oauth:exchange(O, Code, webapp, uri1, badverif) of\n {ok, _} -> ok;\n {error, Why} -> Why\n end")))
|
||||
", case identity_oauth:exchange(O, Code, webapp, uri1, badverif) of\n {ok, _, _} -> ok;\n {error, Why} -> Why\n end")))
|
||||
"invalid_grant")
|
||||
|
||||
;; ── unknown code / request ───────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
@@ -127,7 +148,7 @@
|
||||
"exchanging an unknown code is invalid_grant"
|
||||
(idonm
|
||||
(ido-ev
|
||||
"O = identity_oauth:start(),\n Bogus = make_ref(),\n case identity_oauth:exchange(O, Bogus, webapp, uri1, verif1) of\n {ok, _} -> ok;\n {error, Why} -> Why\n end"))
|
||||
"O = identity_oauth:start(),\n Bogus = make_ref(),\n case identity_oauth:exchange(O, Bogus, webapp, uri1, verif1) of\n {ok, _, _} -> ok;\n {error, Why} -> Why\n end"))
|
||||
"invalid_grant")
|
||||
|
||||
(id-oauth-test
|
||||
@@ -137,7 +158,7 @@
|
||||
"O = identity_oauth:start(),\n Bogus = make_ref(),\n case identity_oauth:consent(O, Bogus, allow) of\n {code, _} -> issued;\n {error, Why} -> Why\n end"))
|
||||
"unknown_request")
|
||||
|
||||
;; ── revocation is real on an exchanged token (RFC 7009) ──────────
|
||||
;; ── revoke-then-use must fail (RFC 7009) ─────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
(id-oauth-test
|
||||
"revoked exchanged token introspects inactive"
|
||||
@@ -145,16 +166,25 @@
|
||||
(ido-ev
|
||||
(str
|
||||
ido-granted
|
||||
", {ok, Tok} = identity_oauth:exchange(O, Code, webapp, uri1, verif1),\n identity_oauth:revoke(O, Tok),\n case identity_oauth:introspect(O, Tok) of\n {active, _, _, _} -> still_valid;\n {inactive} -> inactive\n end")))
|
||||
", {ok, Tok, _R} = identity_oauth:exchange(O, Code, webapp, uri1, verif1),\n identity_oauth:revoke(O, Tok),\n case identity_oauth:introspect(O, Tok) of\n {active, _, _, _} -> still_valid;\n {inactive} -> inactive\n end")))
|
||||
"inactive")
|
||||
|
||||
(id-oauth-test
|
||||
"revoking the access token blocks a later refresh (cascade)"
|
||||
(idonm
|
||||
(ido-ev
|
||||
(str
|
||||
ido-granted
|
||||
", {ok, A, R} = identity_oauth:exchange(O, Code, webapp, uri1, verif1),\n identity_oauth:revoke(O, A),\n case identity_oauth:refresh(O, R) of\n {ok, _, _} -> refreshed;\n {error, Why} -> Why\n end")))
|
||||
"invalid_grant")
|
||||
|
||||
;; ── independence: two concurrent authorizations don't collide ────
|
||||
|
||||
(id-oauth-test
|
||||
"two authorizations issue independent grants"
|
||||
(idonm
|
||||
(ido-ev
|
||||
"O = identity_oauth:start(),\n {consent_required, R1} =\n identity_oauth:authorize(O, webapp, uri1, read, alice, va),\n {consent_required, R2} =\n identity_oauth:authorize(O, cli, uri2, write, bob, vb),\n {code, C1} = identity_oauth:consent(O, R1, allow),\n {code, C2} = identity_oauth:consent(O, R2, allow),\n {ok, _T1} = identity_oauth:exchange(O, C1, webapp, uri1, va),\n {ok, T2} = identity_oauth:exchange(O, C2, cli, uri2, vb),\n case identity_oauth:introspect(O, T2) of\n {active, Subject, _, _} -> Subject\n end"))
|
||||
"O = identity_oauth:start(),\n {consent_required, R1} =\n identity_oauth:authorize(O, webapp, uri1, read, alice, va),\n {consent_required, R2} =\n identity_oauth:authorize(O, cli, uri2, write, bob, vb),\n {code, C1} = identity_oauth:consent(O, R1, allow),\n {code, C2} = identity_oauth:consent(O, R2, allow),\n {ok, _A1, _RR1} = identity_oauth:exchange(O, C1, webapp, uri1, va),\n {ok, A2, _RR2} = identity_oauth:exchange(O, C2, cli, uri2, vb),\n case identity_oauth:introspect(O, A2) of\n {active, Subject, _, _} -> Subject\n end"))
|
||||
"bob")
|
||||
|
||||
(define
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ through the event log, all authorization questions delegated to `acl-on-sx`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Status (rolling)
|
||||
|
||||
`bash lib/identity/conformance.sh` → **62/62** (Phase 1 + authz-code + refresh/rotation/cascade)
|
||||
`bash lib/identity/conformance.sh` → **65/65** (Phases 1–2 complete)
|
||||
|
||||
## Ground rules
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ lib/identity/api.sx ── (identity/login) (identity/grant?) (identity/revoke)
|
||||
## Phase 2 — OAuth2 flows
|
||||
- [x] authorization-code flow as a message protocol
|
||||
- [x] refresh + rotation; revocation cascades to issued tokens
|
||||
- [ ] tests: full code exchange, refresh, revoke-then-use (must fail)
|
||||
- [x] tests: full code exchange, refresh, revoke-then-use (must fail)
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 3 — Silent SSO + membership
|
||||
- [ ] `prompt=none` cross-app login (one session, many clients)
|
||||
@@ -78,6 +78,12 @@ lib/identity/api.sx ── (identity/login) (identity/grant?) (identity/revoke)
|
||||
- [ ] tests: audit completeness, cross-instance subject mapping
|
||||
|
||||
## Progress log
|
||||
- 2026-06-07 — `oauth.sx` refresh wiring + e2e: exchange now issues an
|
||||
access+refresh pair (RFC 6749 §4.1.4/§5.1) via token.sx issue_grant; added
|
||||
the refresh grant (§6) delegating to token rotation. End-to-end tests:
|
||||
code-exchange→refresh→introspect, refresh-reuse rejected, and
|
||||
revoke-then-refresh blocked by cascade. **Phase 2 complete.** +3 → oauth 17,
|
||||
65/65.
|
||||
- 2026-06-07 — `token.sx` grant-centric rewrite: refresh-token rotation
|
||||
(RFC 6749 §6) + cascading revocation. The grant {Subject,Client,Scope,
|
||||
Status} is the cascade unit; access + refresh tokens reference it.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user