Files
rose-ash/lib/haskell/tests/seq.sx
giles 04a25d17d0
Some checks failed
Test, Build, and Deploy / test-build-deploy (push) Has been cancelled
haskell: seq + deepseq via lazy-builtin flag (+9 tests, 368/368)
2026-04-25 00:28:19 +00:00

86 lines
2.1 KiB
Plaintext

;; seq / deepseq tests. seq is strict in its first arg (forces to
;; WHNF) and returns the second arg unchanged. deepseq additionally
;; forces the first arg to normal form.
(define
hk-prog-val
(fn
(src name)
(hk-deep-force (get (hk-eval-program (hk-core src)) name))))
(define hk-as-list
(fn (xs)
(cond
((and (list? xs) (= (first xs) "[]")) (list))
((and (list? xs) (= (first xs) ":"))
(cons (nth xs 1) (hk-as-list (nth xs 2))))
(:else xs))))
(define
hk-eval-list
(fn (src) (hk-as-list (hk-eval-expr-source src))))
;; ── seq returns its second arg ──
(hk-test
"seq with primitive first arg"
(hk-eval-expr-source "seq 1 99")
99)
(hk-test
"seq forces first arg via let"
(hk-eval-expr-source "let x = 1 + 2 in seq x x")
3)
(hk-test
"seq second arg is whatever shape"
(hk-eval-expr-source "seq 0 \"hello\"")
"hello")
;; ── seq enables previously-lazy bottom to be forced ──
;; Without seq the let-binding `x = error …` is never forced;
;; with seq it must be forced because seq is strict in its first
;; argument. We don't run that error case here (it would terminate
;; the test), but we do verify the negative — that without seq,
;; the bottom bound is never demanded.
(hk-test
"lazy let — bottom never forced when unused"
(hk-eval-expr-source "let x = error \"never\" in 42")
42)
;; ── deepseq forces nested structure ──
(hk-test
"deepseq with finite list"
(hk-eval-expr-source "deepseq [1, 2, 3] 7")
7)
(hk-test
"deepseq with constructor value"
(hk-eval-expr-source "deepseq (Just 5) 11")
11)
(hk-test
"deepseq with tuple"
(hk-eval-expr-source "deepseq (1, 2) 13")
13)
;; ── seq + arithmetic ──
(hk-test
"seq used inside arithmetic doesn't poison the result"
(hk-eval-expr-source "(seq 1 5) + (seq 2 7)")
12)
;; ── seq in user code ──
(hk-test
"seq via fun-clause"
(hk-prog-val
"f x = seq x (x + 1)\nresult = f 10"
"result")
11)
(hk-test
"seq sequences list construction"
(hk-eval-list "[seq 1 10, seq 2 20]")
(list 10 20))
{:fails hk-test-fails :pass hk-test-pass :fail hk-test-fail}