Files
rose-ash/lib/kernel/tests/hygiene.sx
giles bf7ec55e92
Some checks failed
Test, Build, and Deploy / test-build-deploy (push) Failing after 29s
kernel: Phase 6 hygiene — $let + $define-in! + 18 tests [shapes-reflective]
Hygiene-by-default was already present: user operatives close over
static-env and bind formals + body $define!s in (extend STATIC-ENV),
caller's env untouched. $let evaluates values in caller env, binds
in fresh child env, runs body there. $define-in! explicitly targets
an env. Full scope-set / frame-stamp hygiene is research-grade
and documented as deferred future work in the reflective API notes.
2026-05-11 20:57:47 +00:00

195 lines
5.4 KiB
Plaintext

;; lib/kernel/tests/hygiene.sx — exercises Phase 6 hygiene helpers.
;;
;; Kernel-on-SX is hygienic by default: $vau/$lambda close over their
;; static env, and bind their formals (plus any $define!s in the body)
;; in a CHILD env. The caller's env is only mutated when user code
;; explicitly threads the env-param through `eval` or `$define-in!`.
;;
;; These tests verify the property, plus the Phase 6 helpers ($let and
;; $define-in!). Shutt's full scope-set hygiene (lifted symbols with
;; provenance markers) is research-grade and is NOT implemented — see
;; the plan's reflective-API notes for the proposed approach.
(define kh-test-pass 0)
(define kh-test-fail 0)
(define kh-test-fails (list))
(define
kh-test
(fn
(name actual expected)
(if
(= actual expected)
(set! kh-test-pass (+ kh-test-pass 1))
(begin
(set! kh-test-fail (+ kh-test-fail 1))
(append! kh-test-fails {:name name :actual actual :expected expected})))))
(define kh-eval-in (fn (src env) (kernel-eval (kernel-parse src) env)))
;; ── Default hygiene: $define! inside operative body stays local ─
(kh-test
"hygiene: vau body $define! doesn't escape"
(let
((env (kernel-standard-env)))
(kh-eval-in "($define! x 1)" env)
(kh-eval-in
"($define! my-op ($vau () _ ($sequence ($define! x 999) x)))"
env)
(kh-eval-in "(my-op)" env)
(kh-eval-in "x" env))
1)
(kh-test
"hygiene: vau body $define! visible inside body"
(let
((env (kernel-standard-env)))
(kh-eval-in "($define! x 1)" env)
(kh-eval-in
"($define! my-op ($vau () _ ($sequence ($define! x 999) x)))"
env)
(kh-eval-in "(my-op)" env))
999)
(kh-test
"hygiene: lambda body $define! doesn't escape"
(let
((env (kernel-standard-env)))
(kh-eval-in "($define! y 50)" env)
(kh-eval-in "($define! f ($lambda () ($sequence ($define! y 7) y)))" env)
(kh-eval-in "(f)" env)
(kh-eval-in "y" env))
50)
(kh-test
"hygiene: caller's binding visible inside operative"
(let
((env (kernel-standard-env)))
(kh-eval-in "($define! caller-x 88)" env)
(kh-eval-in "($define! my-op ($vau () _ caller-x))" env)
(kh-eval-in "(my-op)" env))
88)
;; ── $let — proper hygienic scoping ──────────────────────────────
(kh-test
"let: returns body value"
(kh-eval-in "($let ((x 5)) (+ x 1))" (kernel-standard-env))
6)
(kh-test
"let: multiple bindings"
(kh-eval-in "($let ((x 3) (y 4)) (+ x y))" (kernel-standard-env))
7)
(kh-test
"let: bindings shadow outer"
(let
((env (kernel-standard-env)))
(kh-eval-in "($define! x 1)" env)
(kh-eval-in "($let ((x 99)) x)" env))
99)
(kh-test
"let: bindings don't leak after"
(let
((env (kernel-standard-env)))
(kh-eval-in "($define! x 1)" env)
(kh-eval-in "($let ((x 99)) x)" env)
(kh-eval-in "x" env))
1)
(kh-test
"let: parallel — RHS sees outer, not inner"
(let
((env (kernel-standard-env)))
(kh-eval-in "($define! x 1)" env)
(kh-eval-in "($let ((x 10) (y x)) y)" env))
1)
(kh-test
"let: nested"
(kh-eval-in "($let ((x 1)) ($let ((y 2)) (+ x y)))" (kernel-standard-env))
3)
(kh-test
"let: error on malformed binding"
(guard
(e (true :raised))
(kh-eval-in "($let ((x)) x)" (kernel-standard-env)))
:raised)
(kh-test
"let: error on non-symbol name"
(guard
(e (true :raised))
(kh-eval-in "($let ((1 2)) 1)" (kernel-standard-env)))
:raised)
;; ── $define-in! — explicit env targeting ────────────────────────
(kh-test
"define-in!: binds in chosen env, not dyn-env"
(let
((env (kernel-standard-env)))
(kh-eval-in "($define! sandbox (make-environment))" env)
(kh-eval-in "($define-in! sandbox z 77)" env)
(kernel-env-has? (kh-eval-in "sandbox" env) "z"))
true)
(kh-test
"define-in!: doesn't pollute caller"
(let
((env (kernel-standard-env)))
(kh-eval-in "($define! sandbox (make-environment))" env)
(kh-eval-in "($define-in! sandbox z 77)" env)
(kernel-env-has? env "z"))
false)
(kh-test
"define-in!: error on non-env target"
(guard
(e (true :raised))
(let
((env (kernel-standard-env)))
(kh-eval-in "($define-in! 42 x 1)" env)))
:raised)
;; ── Closure does NOT see post-definition caller binds ───────────
;; The classic "lexical scope wins over dynamic" test.
(kh-test
"lexical: closure sees its own static env"
(let
((env (kernel-standard-env)))
(kh-eval-in "($define! x 1)" env)
(kh-eval-in "($define! get-x ($lambda () x))" env)
(kh-eval-in "($define! x 999)" env)
(kh-eval-in "(get-x)" env))
999)
(kh-test
"lexical: $let-bound name invisible outside"
(guard
(e (true :raised))
(let
((env (kernel-standard-env)))
(kh-eval-in "($let ((private 42)) private)" env)
(kh-eval-in "private" env)))
:raised)
;; ── Operative + $let: hygiene compose ───────────────────────────
(kh-test
"let-inside-vau: temp doesn't escape body"
(let
((env (kernel-standard-env)))
(kh-eval-in "($define! x 1)" env)
(kh-eval-in "($define! op ($vau () _ ($let ((x 5)) x)))" env)
(kh-eval-in "(op)" env)
(kh-eval-in "x" env))
1)
(define kh-tests-run! (fn () {:total (+ kh-test-pass kh-test-fail) :passed kh-test-pass :failed kh-test-fail :fails kh-test-fails}))