Hyperscript compiler/runtime:
- query target support in set/fire/put commands
- hs-set-prolog-hook! / hs-prolog-hook / hs-prolog in runtime
- runtime log-capture cleanup
Scripts: sx-loops-up/down, sx-hs-e-up/down, sx-primitives-down
Plans: datalog, elixir, elm, go, koka, minikanren, ocaml, hs-bucket-f,
designs (breakpoint, null-safety, step-limit, tell, cookies, eval,
plugin-system)
lib/prolog/hs-bridge.sx: initial hook-based bridge draft
lib/common-lisp/tests/runtime.sx: CL runtime tests
WASM: regenerate sx_browser.bc.js from updated hs sources
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
7.5 KiB
Datalog-on-SX: Datalog on the CEK/VM
Datalog is a declarative query language: a restricted subset of Prolog with no function symbols, only relations. Programs are sets of facts and rules; queries ask what follows. Evaluation is bottom-up (fixpoint iteration) rather than Prolog's top-down DFS — which means no infinite loops, guaranteed termination, and efficient incremental updates.
The unique angle: Datalog is a natural companion to the Prolog implementation already in
progress (lib/prolog/). The parser and term representation can share infrastructure;
the evaluator is an entirely different fixpoint engine rather than a DFS solver.
End-state goal: full core Datalog (facts, rules, stratified negation, aggregation, recursion) with a clean SX query API, and a demonstration of Datalog as a query engine for rose-ash data (e.g. federation graph, content relationships).
Ground rules
- Scope: only touch
lib/datalog/**andplans/datalog-on-sx.md. Do not editspec/,hosts/,shared/,lib/prolog/**, or otherlib/<lang>/. - Shared-file issues go under "Blockers" below with a minimal repro; do not fix here.
- SX files: use
sx-treeMCP tools only. - Architecture: Datalog source → term AST → fixpoint evaluator. No transpiler to SX AST — the evaluator is written in SX and works directly on term structures.
- Reference: Ramakrishnan & Ullman "A Survey of Deductive Database Systems"; Dalmau "Datalog and Constraint Satisfaction".
- Commits: one feature per commit. Keep
## Progress logupdated and tick boxes.
Architecture sketch
Datalog source text
│
▼
lib/datalog/tokenizer.sx — atoms, variables, numbers, strings, punct (?- :- , . ( ) [ ])
│
▼
lib/datalog/parser.sx — facts: atom(args). rules: head :- body. queries: ?- goal.
│ No function symbols (only constants and variables in args).
▼
lib/datalog/db.sx — extensional DB (EDB): ground facts; IDB: derived relations;
│ clause index by relation name/arity
▼
lib/datalog/eval.sx — bottom-up fixpoint: semi-naive evaluation with delta sets;
│ stratification for negation; incremental update API
▼
lib/datalog/query.sx — query API: (datalog-query db goal) → list of substitutions;
SX embedding: define facts/rules as SX data directly
Key differences from Prolog:
- No function symbols — args are atoms, numbers, strings, or variables only. No
f(a,b). - No cuts — no procedural control.
- Bottom-up — derive all consequences of all rules before answering; no search tree.
- Termination guaranteed — no infinite derivation chains (no function symbols → finite Herbrand base).
- Stratified negation —
not(P)legal iff P does not recursively depend on its own negation. - Aggregation —
count,sum,min,maxover derived tuples (Datalog+).
Roadmap
Phase 1 — tokenizer + parser
- Tokenizer: atoms (lowercase/quoted), variables (uppercase/
_), numbers, strings, operators (:-,?-,,,.), comments (%,/* */) Note: no function symbol syntax (no nestedf(...)in arg position). - Parser:
- Facts:
parent(tom, bob).→{:head (parent tom bob) :body ()}- Rules:ancestor(X,Z) :- parent(X,Y), ancestor(Y,Z).→{:head (ancestor X Z) :body ((parent X Y) (ancestor Y Z))}- Queries:?- ancestor(tom, X).→{:query (ancestor tom X)}- Negation:not(parent(X,Y))in body position →{:neg (parent X Y)} - Tests in
lib/datalog/tests/parse.sx
Phase 2 — unification + substitution
- Share or port unification from
lib/prolog/— term walk, occurs check off by default dl-unifyt1t2subst→ extended subst or nil (no function symbols means simpler)dl-ground?term→ bool — all variables bound in substitution- Tests: atom/atom, var/atom, var/var, list args
Phase 3 — extensional DB + naive evaluation
- EDB:
{:relation-name → set-of-ground-tuples}using SX sets (Phase 18 of primitives) dl-add-fact!dbrelationargs→ add ground tupledl-add-rule!dbheadbody→ add rule clause- Naive evaluation: iterate rules until fixpoint For each rule, for each combination of body tuples that unify, derive head tuple. Repeat until no new tuples added.
dl-querydbgoal→ list of substitutions satisfying goal against derived DB- Tests: transitive closure (ancestor), sibling, same-generation — classic Datalog programs
Phase 4 — semi-naive evaluation (performance)
- Delta sets: track newly derived tuples per iteration
- Semi-naive rule: only join against delta tuples from last iteration, not full relation
- Significant speedup for recursive rules — avoids re-deriving known tuples
dl-stratifydb→ dependency graph + SCC analysis → stratum ordering- Tests: verify semi-naive produces same results as naive; benchmark on large ancestor chain
Phase 5 — stratified negation
- Dependency graph analysis: which relations depend on which (positively or negatively)
- Stratification check: error if negation is in a cycle (non-stratifiable program)
- Evaluation: process strata in order — lower stratum fully computed before using its complement in a higher stratum
not(P)in rule body: at evaluation time, check P is NOT in the derived EDB- Tests: non-member (
not(member(X,L))), colored-graph (not(same-color(X,Y))), stratification error detection
Phase 6 — aggregation (Datalog+)
count(X, Goal)→ number of distinct X satisfying Goalsum(X, Goal)→ sum of X values satisfying Goalmin(X, Goal)/max(X, Goal)→ min/max of X satisfying Goalgroup-bysemantics:count(X, sibling(bob, X))→ count of bob's siblings- Aggregation breaks stratification — evaluate in a separate post-fixpoint pass
- Tests: social network statistics, grade aggregation, inventory sums
Phase 7 — SX embedding API
(dl-program facts rules)→ database from SX data directly (no parsing required)(dl-program '((parent tom bob) (parent tom liz) (parent bob ann)) '((ancestor X Z :- (parent X Y) (ancestor Y Z)) (ancestor X Y :- (parent X Y))))(dl-query db '(ancestor tom ?X))→((ann) (bob) (liz) (pat))(dl-assert! db '(parent ann pat))→ incremental fact addition + re-derive(dl-retract! db '(parent tom bob))→ fact removal + re-derive from scratch- Integration demo: federation graph query —
(ancestor actor1 actor2)over rose-ash ActivityPub follow relationships
Phase 8 — Datalog as a query language for rose-ash
- Schema: map SQLAlchemy model relationships to Datalog EDB facts
(e.g.
(follows user1 user2),(authored user post),(tagged post tag)) - Loader:
dl-load-from-db!— query PostgreSQL, populate Datalog EDB - Query examples:
-
?- ancestor(me, X), authored(X, Post), tagged(Post, cooking).→ posts about cooking by people I follow (transitively) -?- popular(Post) :- tagged(Post, T), count(L, (liked(L, Post))) >= 10.→ posts with 10+ likes - Expose as a rose-ash service endpoint:
POST /internal/datalogwith program + query
Blockers
(none yet)
Progress log
Newest first.
(awaiting phase 1)