plans: six subsystem outline plans for the SX rewrite (store, commerce, identity, content, events, host)

Gap analysis from the five-subsystem set (acl/feed/flow/mod/search):
- store-on-sx: event-sourcing foundation the others fake with in-memory lists (build first)
- commerce-on-sx: catalog/cart/pricing/orders on miniKanren (+ store + flow)
- identity-on-sx: OAuth2/sessions/membership on Erlang (the core acl assumes)
- content-on-sx: documents/blocks/CRDT on Smalltalk
- events-on-sx: calendar/ticketing on Datalog + flow-driven delivery
- host-on-sx: the web boundary — off Quart onto native server+SXTP now, dream-on-sx next

All DRAFT outlines; substrate choices proposed, not final.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-06-06 17:39:29 +00:00
parent 1e4cf25015
commit ff537bfba2
6 changed files with 521 additions and 0 deletions

100
plans/host-on-sx.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@
# host-on-sx: The SX web host — off Quart, onto the kernel (Dream-bound)
> **DRAFT outline.** The integration boundary that turns the subsystem libraries
> into running services, and the strangler path off Python/Quart. This is the
> dependency hub — it imports every subsystem. Decision recorded below: native
> server + SXTP **now**, `dream-on-sx` framework layer **next**, Python only at the
> external-integration edges.
The subsystems (`feed`, `search`, `acl`, `mod`, `flow`, `commerce`, `identity`,
`content`, `events`) are libraries. Something has to receive an HTTP request, route
it, call the right subsystem, and serialize the response. Today that's Python/Quart
— the one large non-SX component in the stack: separate runtime, deploy, and
failure mode. The goal is to move the web/host/domain layer onto the SX substrate
and retire Quart, **incrementally (strangler-fig), never big-bang.**
This is already underway: a native OCaml HTTP server is live in prod on
`sx.rose-ash.com` (~3ms cached, ~323 req/s, ~2MB RSS), `defhandler`/`defpage`
exist, and a partial **SXTP** protocol is specced. That is the unblocked near-term
host — no `ocaml-on-sx` dependency.
## Two layers, two timelines
1. **Now (unblocked): native server + SXTP adapter + SX handlers.** Route rose-ash
endpoints onto the SX host one at a time. Each migrated endpoint is an SX
handler dispatching to a subsystem; Quart proxies the rest until cut over.
2. **Next: `dream-on-sx` as the framework layer.** Dream gives Quart-grade
ergonomics — typed routing, middleware stacks, sessions, CSRF. It is gated on
`ocaml-on-sx` Phases 15 + minimal stdlib. **This plan is the concrete target
user that un-parks `dream-on-sx`** (see `plans/dream-on-sx.md`): "the subsystems
need an HTTP front door" is the real feature pulling Dream. Until then, do not
block migration on Dream — the native server is sufficient.
3. **Always: Python only at the edges.** External integrations — SumUp payments,
Ghost CMS, ActivityPub crypto, IPFS/Kubo — ride Python libraries today. They
stay as thin injected adapters (Python/FFI) behind subsystem interfaces until
native replacements exist. "Drop Quart" ≠ "drop every line of Python."
## Status (rolling)
`bash lib/host/conformance.sh`**0/0** (not yet started)
## Ground rules
- **Scope:** `lib/host/**` and `plans/host-on-sx.md`. May **import** every subsystem
+ the kernel's server/SXTP surface. Do **not** edit `spec/`, `hosts/`, `shared/`,
or subsystem internals — wire to their public APIs only. Host-primitive / server
changes belong in `hosts/` (out of scope) → Blockers.
- **Architecture:** a route maps (method, path) → handler; a handler is an SX fn
`request -> response` that calls subsystem APIs; middleware is composed handlers
(auth via `identity`, permission via `acl`, mute via subsystem prefs). SXTP is the
wire format between host and subsystem-as-service.
- **Migration discipline:** each endpoint moved must be behavior-equivalent to its
Quart original (golden-response test before flip). Keep a migration ledger.
- **Commits:** one feature per commit. Progress log + tick boxes.
## Architecture sketch
```
HTTP request HTTP response
│ ▲
▼ │
native OCaml http server (prod) ──────► lib/host/router.sx
(hosts/ — out of scope) — (method,path) → handler
│ ▲
▼ │
lib/host/middleware.sx lib/host/handler.sx
— auth(identity) ∘ acl ∘ mute ∘ ... — request → subsystem call → response
│ ▲
▼ │
lib/host/sxtp.sx subsystem APIs (feed/search/commerce/…)
— wire format, host↔service — called via public interfaces
└── external edges: SumUp / Ghost / AP / IPFS → injected Python/FFI adapters
```
## Phase 1 — Router + handler + one real endpoint
- [ ] `router.sx` — route table, (method,path) match
- [ ] `handler.sx` — request/response model, subsystem dispatch
- [ ] migrate ONE read endpoint (e.g. a feed timeline) end-to-end, golden test
- [ ] `conformance.sh` + scoreboard
## Phase 2 — Middleware + SXTP
- [ ] `middleware.sx` — composable auth/acl/mute/error layers
- [ ] `sxtp.sx` — host↔subsystem wire format (align with existing spec)
- [ ] migrate a write endpoint (auth + permission + action)
## Phase 3 — Strangler migration ledger
- [ ] enumerate Quart endpoints; track migrated vs proxied
- [ ] golden-response harness vs the live Quart responses
- [ ] cut over a whole domain (smallest: `likes` or `relations`) as proof
## Phase 4 — Dream framework layer (gated)
- [ ] gate: `ocaml-on-sx` Phases 15 + minimal stdlib green
- [ ] adopt `dream-on-sx` routing/middleware/session ergonomics over the same handlers
- [ ] re-home external adapters as native where replacements land
## Progress log
(loop fills this in)
## Blockers
(loop fills this in)