acl: Phase 4 federation (trust-gated delegation, revocation) + 31 tests
Some checks failed
Test, Build, and Deploy / test-build-deploy (push) Failing after 10m25s
Some checks failed
Test, Build, and Deploy / test-build-deploy (push) Failing after 10m25s
federation.sx adds peer/trust/delegate/level_covers facts and one engine rule: delegated grants apply only when local trust covers the action, re-checked every query (non-transitive, fail-safe). Local/inherited deny overrides federated grants; delegation composes with group and resource inheritance. acl-revoke!/acl-fed-assert! propagate retraction/assertion; mock fed-sx transport for tests. Federated proofs reconstruct via the existing explainer. Roadmap complete: 120/120. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -4,12 +4,14 @@
|
||||
;; reduces a (subject, action, resource) decision to a Datalog query against a
|
||||
;; db built from EDB facts. The rule engine itself is Datalog's.
|
||||
;;
|
||||
;; Policy — inheritance with deny-overrides:
|
||||
;; Policy — inheritance + federation with deny-overrides:
|
||||
;;
|
||||
;; eff_grant(S,A,R) :- grant(S,A,R). ; direct
|
||||
;; eff_grant(S,A,R) :- member_of(S,G), eff_grant(G,A,R). ; group/role chain
|
||||
;; eff_grant(S,A,R) :- child_of(R,P), eff_grant(S,A,P). ; resource tree
|
||||
;; eff_grant(S,A,R) :- member_of(S,Role), role_grant(Role,A,R). ; role expansion
|
||||
;; eff_grant(S,A,R) :- delegate(Peer,S,A,R), ; federated grant
|
||||
;; trust(Peer,L), level_covers(L,A).
|
||||
;;
|
||||
;; eff_deny(S,A,R) :- deny(S,A,R). ; direct
|
||||
;; eff_deny(S,A,R) :- member_of(S,G), eff_deny(G,A,R). ; group chain
|
||||
@@ -18,15 +20,22 @@
|
||||
;; permit(S,A,R) :- eff_grant(S,A,R), not eff_deny(S,A,R).
|
||||
;;
|
||||
;; DENY-OVERRIDES: an effective deny anywhere in the inheritance closure of
|
||||
;; (S,A,R) defeats any effective grant. Deny inherits through the *same* group
|
||||
;; and resource chains as grant, so a group-level or ancestor-resource deny is
|
||||
;; authoritative for members/descendants — not just a deny naming the exact
|
||||
;; (S,A,R). This is the principled, fail-safe reading of "deny wins".
|
||||
;; (S,A,R) defeats any effective grant — including federated grants. Deny
|
||||
;; inherits through the *same* group and resource chains as grant, so a
|
||||
;; group-level or ancestor-resource deny is authoritative for members/
|
||||
;; descendants. This is the principled, fail-safe reading of "deny wins".
|
||||
;;
|
||||
;; FEDERATION — non-transitive trust: a peer's `delegate` fact only grants if a
|
||||
;; *local* `trust(Peer, L)` exists AND that level `level_covers` the action.
|
||||
;; Trust is re-checked on every query (it is a body literal), never baked in at
|
||||
;; fact-ingestion time, so revoking trust or narrowing a level takes effect
|
||||
;; immediately on the next decision.
|
||||
;;
|
||||
;; Termination & stratification:
|
||||
;; - eff_grant/eff_deny recurse only over member_of and child_of, which are
|
||||
;; EDB relations with no function symbols, so the closure is finite (cyclic
|
||||
;; membership/containment just reaches a fixpoint, never loops).
|
||||
;; membership/containment just reaches a fixpoint, never loops). The
|
||||
;; federation rule is non-recursive.
|
||||
;; - permit negates eff_deny; neither eff_grant nor eff_deny depends on
|
||||
;; permit, so the program is stratifiable (permit sits in a higher stratum).
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -37,6 +46,14 @@
|
||||
(eff_grant S A R <- (member_of S G) (eff_grant G A R))
|
||||
(eff_grant S A R <- (child_of R P) (eff_grant S A P))
|
||||
(eff_grant S A R <- (member_of S Role) (role_grant Role A R))
|
||||
(eff_grant
|
||||
S
|
||||
A
|
||||
R
|
||||
<-
|
||||
(delegate Peer S A R)
|
||||
(trust Peer L)
|
||||
(level_covers L A))
|
||||
(eff_deny S A R <- (deny S A R))
|
||||
(eff_deny S A R <- (member_of S G) (eff_deny G A R))
|
||||
(eff_deny S A R <- (child_of R P) (eff_deny S A P))
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user