mod: Ext 15 — disjunctive (:any) conditions, 333/333
Some checks failed
Test, Build, and Deploy / test-build-deploy (push) Failing after 29s

(:any (list c1 c2 ...)) compiles to Prolog disjunction (g1 ; g2 ; ...), completing
the condition boolean algebra (AND via :when list, :not, :any). cond->goal
recurses so combinators nest arbitrarily; the proof tree shows the compiled
disjunction verbatim. Maps onto Prolog's control constructs rather than
reimplementing boolean logic in SX. +10 tests.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-06-06 19:23:15 +00:00
parent b43901d297
commit 329b3c4903
6 changed files with 185 additions and 14 deletions

View File

@@ -48,4 +48,5 @@ SUITES=(
"temporal:lib/mod/tests/temporal.sx:(mod-temporal-tests-run!)"
"sla:lib/mod/tests/sla.sx:(mod-sla-tests-run!)"
"wire:lib/mod/tests/wire.sx:(mod-wire-tests-run!)"
"disjunction:lib/mod/tests/disjunction.sx:(mod-disjunction-tests-run!)"
)

View File

@@ -1,10 +1,13 @@
;; lib/mod/policy.sx — moderation rules → Prolog clauses.
;;
;; A rule is {:name :action :when}. :when is a list of condition forms; each
;; compiles to a Prolog goal. Rule order is precedence: the engine queries with
;; pl-query-one, so the first clause that proves wins. The final default rule has
;; an empty body (true) so every report yields at least :keep — "no rule matched"
;; is a real result, not a query failure.
;; compiles to a Prolog goal. The conditions in a :when list are ANDed (joined by
;; ", "); :not negates and :any (a list of sub-conditions) disjoins — so the
;; condition language is a small boolean algebra over the leaf predicates.
;; Rule order is precedence: the engine queries with pl-query-one, so the first
;; clause that proves wins. The final default rule has an empty body (true) so
;; every report yields at least :keep — "no rule matched" is a real result, not a
;; query failure.
;;
;; cond->goal takes an id-term so the same condition can be compiled with the
;; head variable "Id" (for clause bodies) or a concrete report id (for proof-tree
@@ -43,14 +46,14 @@
;; (:classification "spam") → classification(Id, spam)
;; (:evidence "kind") → evidence(Id, 'kind', _)
;; (:attr "verified") → attr(Id, verified)
;; (:not <cond>) → not(<cond>) (negation as failure)
;; (:not <cond>) → not(<cond>) (negation)
;; (:any (list c1 c2 ...)) → (g1 ; g2 ; ...) (disjunction)
;; (:count-at-least 3) → report(Id, B, S), report_count(S, N), N >= 3
;; (:score-at-least 5) → aggregate_all(sum(W), signal(Id, _, W), T), T >= 5
;; (:reporters-at-least 2) → report(Id, _, Sr), setof(Br, report(_, Br, Sr), Bsr),
;; length(Bsr, Nr), Nr >= 2 (distinct reporters;
;; needs the quorum engine which asserts every report)
;; length(Bsr, Nr), Nr >= 2 (quorum engine)
;; (:burst-at-least 3) → report(Id, _, Sb), burst_count(Sb, Nb), Nb >= 3
;; (reports in a time window; needs the temporal engine)
;; (temporal engine)
(define
mod/cond->goal
@@ -71,6 +74,15 @@
((= tag :attr) (str "attr(" idterm ", " (nth c 1) ")"))
((= tag :not)
(str "not(" (mod/cond->goal (nth c 1) idterm) ")"))
((= tag :any)
(str
"("
(mod/join-with
" ; "
(map
(fn (sub) (mod/cond->goal sub idterm))
(nth c 1)))
")"))
((= tag :count-at-least)
(str
"report("

View File

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
{
"lang": "mod",
"total_passed": 323,
"total_passed": 333,
"total_failed": 0,
"total": 323,
"total": 333,
"suites": [
{"name":"decide","passed":31,"failed":0,"total":31},
{"name":"audit","passed":29,"failed":0,"total":29},
@@ -19,7 +19,8 @@
{"name":"batch","passed":17,"failed":0,"total":17},
{"name":"temporal","passed":15,"failed":0,"total":15},
{"name":"sla","passed":15,"failed":0,"total":15},
{"name":"wire","passed":16,"failed":0,"total":16}
{"name":"wire","passed":16,"failed":0,"total":16},
{"name":"disjunction","passed":10,"failed":0,"total":10}
],
"generated": "2026-06-06T19:16:49+00:00"
"generated": "2026-06-06T19:22:42+00:00"
}

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# mod scoreboard
**323 / 323 passing** (0 failure(s)).
**333 / 333 passing** (0 failure(s)).
| Suite | Passed | Total | Status |
|-------|--------|-------|--------|
@@ -20,3 +20,4 @@
| temporal | 15 | 15 | ok |
| sla | 15 | 15 | ok |
| wire | 16 | 16 | ok |
| disjunction | 10 | 10 | ok |

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
;; lib/mod/tests/disjunction.sx — Ext 15: disjunctive (:any) conditions.
(define mod-or-count 0)
(define mod-or-pass 0)
(define mod-or-fail 0)
(define mod-or-failures (list))
(define
mod-or-test!
(fn
(name got expected)
(begin
(set! mod-or-count (+ mod-or-count 1))
(if
(= got expected)
(set! mod-or-pass (+ mod-or-pass 1))
(begin
(set! mod-or-fail (+ mod-or-fail 1))
(append!
mod-or-failures
(str name "\n expected: " expected "\n got: " got)))))))
;; one rule, OR of two classifications → one action covers both
(define
mod-or-rules
(list
(mod/mk-rule
"spam-or-abuse-hide"
:hide (list
(list
:any (list (list :classification "spam") (list :classification "abuse")))))
(mod/mk-rule "default-keep" :keep (list))))
(define mod-or-spam (mod/mk-report "r1" "a" "b" "this is spam"))
(define mod-or-abuse (mod/mk-report "r2" "a" "b" "harassment here"))
(define mod-or-clean (mod/mk-report "r3" "a" "b" "a fine post"))
(mod-or-test!
"OR: spam branch → hide"
(get
(mod/decide-report mod-or-spam (list mod-or-spam) mod-or-rules)
:action)
"hide")
(mod-or-test!
"OR: abuse branch → hide"
(get
(mod/decide-report mod-or-abuse (list mod-or-abuse) mod-or-rules)
:action)
"hide")
(mod-or-test!
"OR: neither branch → keep"
(get
(mod/decide-report mod-or-clean (list mod-or-clean) mod-or-rules)
:action)
"keep")
;; ── goal text + proof ──
(mod-or-test!
"cond->goal :any joins with ;"
(mod/cond->goal
(list
:any (list (list :classification "spam") (list :classification "abuse")))
"Id")
"(classification(Id, spam) ; classification(Id, abuse))")
(define
mod-or-dec
(mod/decide-report mod-or-spam (list mod-or-spam) mod-or-rules))
(mod-or-test!
"OR proof goal solved"
(get (first (get (get mod-or-dec :proof) :goals)) :solved)
true)
(mod-or-test!
"OR proof goal text"
(get (first (get (get mod-or-dec :proof) :goals)) :goal)
"(classification(r1, spam) ; classification(r1, abuse))")
;; ── :any composes with :not (NOR-ish) and :attr ──
(define
mod-or-mixed-rules
(list
(mod/mk-rule
"spam-or-flagged-hide"
:hide (list
(list
:any (list (list :classification "spam") (list :attr "flagged")))))
(mod/mk-rule "default-keep" :keep (list))))
(define
mod-or-flagged
(mod/attach-attr (mod/mk-report "r4" "a" "b" "a fine post") "flagged"))
(mod-or-test!
"OR over classification|attr: flagged clean post → hide"
(get
(mod/decide-report
mod-or-flagged
(list mod-or-flagged)
mod-or-mixed-rules)
:action)
"hide")
(mod-or-test!
"cond->goal :any with :not branch"
(mod/cond->goal
(list
:any (list
(list :classification "spam")
(list :not (list :attr "verified"))))
"Id")
"(classification(Id, spam) ; not(attr(Id, verified)))")
;; AND still works alongside OR in the same :when list
(define
mod-or-and-rules
(list
(mod/mk-rule
"spam-and-not-verified"
:hide (list
(list
:any (list (list :classification "spam") (list :classification "abuse")))
(list :not (list :attr "verified"))))
(mod/mk-rule "default-keep" :keep (list))))
(define
mod-or-spam-verified
(mod/attach-attr (mod/mk-report "r5" "a" "b" "this is spam") "verified"))
(mod-or-test!
"AND of OR + NOT: verified spam → keep"
(get
(mod/decide-report
mod-or-spam-verified
(list mod-or-spam-verified)
mod-or-and-rules)
:action)
"keep")
(mod-or-test!
"AND of OR + NOT: unverified abuse → hide"
(get
(mod/decide-report mod-or-abuse (list mod-or-abuse) mod-or-and-rules)
:action)
"hide")
(define mod-disjunction-tests-run! (fn () {:failures mod-or-failures :total mod-or-count :passed mod-or-pass :failed mod-or-fail}))