erlang: ring.erl + call/cc suspension rewrite (+4 ring tests)
Some checks failed
Test, Build, and Deploy / test-build-deploy (push) Has been cancelled

This commit is contained in:
2026-04-24 22:24:17 +00:00
parent 97513e5b96
commit 2a3340f8e1
4 changed files with 170 additions and 26 deletions

View File

@@ -293,21 +293,23 @@
(fn
(vs)
(cond
(= (len vs) 1)
(let
((reason (nth vs 0)))
(shift k (er-mk-exit-marker reason)))
(= (len vs) 1) (raise (er-mk-exit-marker (nth vs 0)))
(= (len vs) 2)
(error
"Erlang: exit/2 (signal another process) deferred to Phase 4 (links)")
:else (error "Erlang: exit: wrong arity"))))
;; ── scheduler loop ──────────────────────────────────────────────
;; Each process's entry runs inside a `reset`; `receive` uses `shift`
;; to suspend (saving a continuation on the proc record). When a `!`
;; delivers a message to a waiting process we re-enqueue it — the
;; scheduler step invokes the saved continuation, which retries the
;; receive against the updated mailbox.
;; Each scheduler step wraps the process body in `guard`. `receive`
;; with no match captures a `call/cc` continuation onto the proc
;; record and then `raise`s `er-suspend-marker`; the guard catches
;; the raise and the scheduler moves on. `exit/1` raises an exit
;; marker the same way. Resumption from a saved continuation also
;; runs under a fresh `guard` so a resumed receive that needs to
;; suspend again has a handler to unwind to. `shift`/`reset` aren't
;; usable here because SX's captured delimited continuations don't
;; re-establish their own reset boundary when invoked — a second
;; suspension during replay raises "shift without enclosing reset".
(define er-suspend-marker {:tag "er-suspend-marker"})
(define
@@ -380,15 +382,17 @@
(let
((prev-k (er-proc-field pid :continuation))
(result-ref (list nil)))
(if
(= prev-k nil)
(guard
(c
((er-suspended? c) (set-nth! result-ref 0 c))
((er-exited? c) (set-nth! result-ref 0 c)))
(set-nth!
result-ref
0
(reset (er-apply-fun (er-proc-field pid :initial-fun) (list))))
(do
(er-proc-set! pid :continuation nil)
(set-nth! result-ref 0 (prev-k nil))))
(if
(= prev-k nil)
(er-apply-fun (er-proc-field pid :initial-fun) (list))
(do (er-proc-set! pid :continuation nil) (prev-k nil)))))
(let
((r (nth result-ref 0)))
(cond