# Abstraction Radar — backlog

Maintained by the read-only `radar` loop (see `plans/agent-briefings/radar-loop.md`).
Detection only — implementation is a separate, coordinated step owned by the
relevant subsystem loop, never by radar.

**AHA gate to reach _Proposed_:** ≥3 real consumers · all past Phase 2 & API-stable ·
structurally identical (file:line evidence) · a natural home (usually NOT lib/guest).
Anything short → _Watching_ (what's missing) or _Rejected_ (why).

---

## Last scan

- **Date:** 2026-06-07 (radar loop, passes 26–27)
- **Passes 26–27 (routine tracking):** conformance loop steady at ~1 migration/iteration —
  erlang 761/761, then feed 189/189. A1 = 8 on architecture + 3 on the branch; 6 remain.
  W4 still gated (host-persist adapter not landed); no new subsystem; app loops on
  incremental domain work (commerce Phase 5 payment envelope, content/events/identity/fed-sx).
  Nothing new to discover; merge-time adopter-parity flag still open.
- **Date:** 2026-06-07 (radar loop, pass 25)
- **Pass 25:** A1 → **8 adopters** (events via its own loop) + common-lisp 487/487 on the
  conformance branch. The conformance loop **extended the shared `lib/guest` driver**
  (per-suite counters/preloads) to do it → raised a **coordination flag in A1**: verify the
  branch is non-regressive against all 8 adopters before merging to architecture. commerce
  drafting Phase 5 provider-neutral payment envelope. No new candidate; A1 advancing fast.
- **Date:** 2026-06-07 (radar loop, pass 24)
- **Pass 24 — three real updates.** (1) **A1 → 7 adopters** (search migrated, counters mode
  — corrects the earlier exclusion). (2) The dedicated `conformance` loop ran its 1st
  iteration: refused to force-migrate common-lisp (parity gate worked) and surfaced a
  **driver feature-gap** (per-suite counters + preloads) gating the complex multi-suite
  candidates → A1 now splits simple-now vs gated-on-driver-enhancement. (3) **W8 commerce
  is LIVE** ("order lifecycle as a durable flow-on-sx flow, Phase 3 done") → 2 live flow
  consumers. events shipped TZ/DST; mod reverted its extraction note (declined on re-read).
- **Date:** 2026-06-07 (radar loop, pass 23)
- **Pass 23 — trigger fired (empty streak ends at 19–22).** commerce recorded a Phase 3
  **flow-integration design** (order saga as a flow-on-sx flow, payment suspended until
  webhook resume) → 2nd durable-flow consumer; **W8 broadened** from "delivery" to
  "externally-resumed orchestration on lib/flow." events made its federation transport
  **fed-sx-ready** (injected) → reinforces W1's 5/5 inject-fed-sx seam. acl left tmux
  (now fully quiescent). host-persist adapter still not landed (W4 migration still gated).
- **Empty-discovery streak: passes 19–22** (last verified pass 22). Fleet at steady state —
  active loops (content CvRDT, events recurrence/reschedule, identity grant-mgmt, fed-sx
  outbox internals) are building *inside* their domains, not cross-cutting infra. Census
  exhausted (p17); all gates re-tested (W1 p18, W2 p19). No new candidate clears any gate.
- **Radar is now trigger-driven.** The next substantive pass needs one of: **(a)** a new
  subsystem worktree spawning (auto-joins scan), or **(b)** host-persist's durable adapter
  landing → unblocks the W4 acl/mod→persist/log migration, or **(c)** a quiescent
  subsystem (acl/mod/search/commerce, static ~9–16 passes) resuming. Polling ~hourly until
  one fires; will tighten cadence then.
- **Date:** 2026-06-07 (radar loop, pass 20)
- **Pass 20 — honest empty pass.** 3 new census recurrences since p17 (normalize/index ×2,
  query ×3) — all **name collisions** (same noun, domain-specific op), added to the table.
  Recorded the meta-pattern: the fleet shares vocabulary, not structure. Most subsystems
  quiescent (acl/mod/search/commerce static ~9-15 passes = API-stable); only events/
  identity/content/fed-sx still committing domain features. No new gate-clearer.
- **Date:** 2026-06-07 (radar loop, pass 19)
- **Pass 19 — honest empty pass.** Scanned 10 active subsystems. content/index.sx is a
  blog index/tag-cloud listing (presentation, not full-text search — no search reinvention)
  and content/multi-doc indexing adds no per-viewer filter. **W2 re-tested: still 2**
  (feed, search) — acl's `permit?`-like matches are its own authZ *engine* (the home),
  not a downstream read filter. No new candidate cleared any gate.
- **Date:** 2026-06-07 (radar loop, pass 18)
- **Pass 18 — W1 gate re-test.** events shipped Phase 4 federation (5th consumer): a 5th
  divergent merge (sorted agenda + `:origin` provenance), trust-gate = runtime list
  membership (shares mod's mechanism, not acl's). Reinforces W1's "theme not shape" — but
  the **inject-fed-sx-transport seam is now 5/5**, strengthening "all are fed-sx
  consumers-in-waiting." Trust sub-pattern refined: mod+events (runtime set) vs acl (rule).
- **Date:** 2026-06-07 (radar loop, pass 17)
- **Pass 17 — filename census declared EXHAUSTED** (see the Census-status table above).
  Examined the last unswept ≥2 recurrences (schema/engine = acl⇄mod substrate twins;
  catalog/batch = name collisions; store = divergent). No new candidate. Incremental churn
  elsewhere (content 621/621, identity PAR, events reminders). Future passes pivot from
  censusing to re-testing gates as consumers mature.
- **Date:** 2026-06-07 (radar loop, pass 16)
- **Pass 16:** events started Phase 3 — **durable notification delivery on `lib/flow`**
  (new W8: at-least-once + idempotency exemplar; fed-sx/mod roll their own outbox). The two
  `notify.sx` (feed vs events) are a name collision (read-side digest vs delivery), noted
  in W8. Substrate-adoption story deepening: app domains now consume persist (content/
  commerce/events), flow (events), commerce (events), acl-authZ (identity).
- **Date:** 2026-06-07 (radar loop, pass 15)
- **Pass 15:** added the **scanning-method note** above after `query.sx` again proved to
  be merged-lib copies (lib/prolog + lib/persist in every worktree). Corrected census
  surfaced `wire`×2 (content+mod) → Rejected (shared role, divergent structure: generic SX
  serializer vs bespoke pipe-format under a Prolog-env string-prim constraint). events↔
  commerce integration appeared (paid tickets); acl/mod/search quiescent ~7 passes (now
  API-stable). No new gate-clearer.
- **Date:** 2026-06-07 (radar loop, pass 14)
- **Pass 14:** filename census flagged `snapshot`×?? — but the `*/lib/persist/snapshot.sx`
  copies are just the merged `lib/persist` in each worktree, NOT consumers (same artifact
  as `lib/feed/rank.sx` everywhere). The one distinct file, `content/snapshot.sx`,
  reimplements persist's projection-checkpoint on raw KV instead of using `persist/snapshot`
  → new W7 (persist-adoption nudge). `audit`×3 = the W4 fakes (acl/mod/identity), known.
- **Date:** 2026-06-07 (radar loop, pass 13)
- **Pass 13 — honest re-test, no gate-clearer.** Re-tested the two longest-waiting gates
  against the maturing app-domain loops: **W2** (per-viewer visibility) still 2 consumers
  (feed, search) — commerce/content/events/identity add no per-viewer read filter; **W3**
  (pagination) still 2 (feed, search) — `content/page.sx` is an HTML wrapper, not
  pagination (filename collision, noted in W3). Incremental churn only elsewhere.
- **Date:** 2026-06-07 (radar loop, pass 12)
- **Pass 12:** `events` shipped **transactional booking on persist** (3rd live persist
  consumer) using `persist/append-expect` (optimistic-concurrency CAS, lock-free capacity
  safety). W4 ledger now shows a persist feature-ladder append → append-once → append-expect
  that the hand-rolled fakes can't match. No new candidate; W4 reinforced.
- **Date:** 2026-06-07 (radar loop, pass 11)
- **Pass 11 — W4 sharpened with a consumer ledger.** commerce built an **order ledger on
  persist** (2nd live exemplar; uses `persist/append-once` for webhook idempotency) and
  identity a **grant audit ledger** (in-memory Erlang fake, gated on an Erlang↔persist
  bridge). The append-only monotonic-seq event-log pattern is now validated across 4
  domains, 2 live on persist + 3 fakes flagged for adoption. See W4 table.
- **Date:** 2026-06-07 (radar loop, pass 10)
- **Pass 10:** commerce/content/events/identity advancing (content 238/238). Probed a
  shape outside the routing table — **guarded lifecycle state machines** (mod/lifecycle +
  identity/membership) → new W6: shared *design principle*, divergent *structure*
  (SX transition-table vs Erlang gen_server), NOT an extraction target. No gate-clearer.
- **Date:** 2026-06-07 (radar loop, pass 9)
- **Pass 9:** `commerce` + `content` reached Phase 2 (`content` 162/162). **Key find:
  `content` built its op log directly on `persist/log`** (backend-injected, append+replay-
  to-seq) — the live reference exemplar for W4 (see W4). `events` MONTHLY RRULE,
  `identity` OAuth2 auth-code + PKCE, search boolean-filtered ranked. A1 still 6 adopters.
- **Date:** 2026-06-06 (radar loop, pass 8)
- **Pass 8 — fleet expanded by 4 app-domain loops** (the briefing's anticipated
  `commerce`/`identity` arrivals, auto-picked up by dynamic discovery). All early-stage,
  **pre-Phase-2 → moving targets, none count toward any gate yet**:
  - `commerce` (Phase 1: `api/cart/catalog/price`). Its "per-line audit" is a cost
    *breakdown view* (`api.sx:44`), **not** an append-only decision log → NOT a W4
    consumer.
  - `events` (Phase 1: `calendar.sx`, RRULE expansion).
  - `identity` (early: `session/token`). Defers authZ to acl (`token.sx:15`) — reinforces
    W2's "delegate `permit?` to acl-on-sx" routing; identity = authN, acl = authZ.
  - `content` (just-started: `block.sx`).
  These are the future consumers W2/W3 are waiting on — re-check their per-viewer filters
  / pagination once each clears Phase 2. No new gate-clearer this pass.
- **Pass 7:** **A1 jumped 4→6 adopters** — `acl` + `mod` migrated to the shared
  conformance driver (first app-domain adopters; proves it generalizes past substrates).
  `host-persist` closed its blob-adapter blocker (durable storage adapter now landing →
  W4 migration path opening). search shipped proximity/NEAR; flow + persist quiescent.
- **Pass 6:** new worktree **`host-persist`** (active — building persist's durable host
  adapter); `feed` went quiescent (left tmux). acl shipped hardening (+25), fed-sx-m1 at
  Step 6c. **mod loop independently wrote a shared-plumbing note** (`mod-on-sx.md`,
  538b8a53) corroborating W4/W5 — folded its claims + home disagreements into W1/W4/W5.
  No new gate-clearer (audit log still 2 consumers), but consumers are now API-stable.
- **Pass 5:** search (+highlight/snippet) and fed-sx-m1 (+follower_graph) moved; rest
  unchanged. Filename census: `api`×6, `fed`×3, then `schema/rank/query/page/explain/
  engine/batch/audit`×2. Examined the ×6 `api.sx` → Rejected (shared name, divergent
  structure incl. implicit-vs-explicit-state contract). rank/batch/engine all ≤2 +
  substrate/domain-divergent → no new gate-clearer.
- **Pass 4:** no churn vs pass 3 (same worktrees/tmux/HEADs/adopters). Swept audit+explain
  surfaces: acl/mod share an append-only-log shape (→ sharpened W4 with persist/log API
  evidence) and a proof-explain shape (→ new W5, substrate-bound). No new gate-clearer.
- **Pass 3 (earlier today):** subsystem set + tmux + A1 adopters (4) all unchanged vs pass 2. Loops
  advanced: acl shipped Phase 4 federation; search shipped Phase 4 + pagination; feed
  shipped pagination/threading; mod at Ext 19 (capstone); persist did a worked acl-grants
  migration (W4). New shape found: offset/limit pagination → folded into W3.
- **Subsystem set discovered:** loop worktrees `acl, erlang, fed-prims, fed-sx-m1,
  feed, flow, go, kernel, mod, ocaml, persist, radar, ruby, search,
  sx-vm-extensions`; main-repo `lib/*` incl. merged `feed` + substrates (`apl,
  common-lisp, datalog, erlang, forth, go, haskell, hyperscript, js, lua, minikanren,
  ocaml, prolog, scheme, smalltalk, tcl`) + `lib/guest`.
  Actively looping (tmux): `acl, fed-sx-m1, feed, flow, mod, persist, search`
  (+ radar).
- **New since pass 1:** worktrees `kernel` (empty/unset — not yet a repo) and `ocaml`
  (`lib/ocaml/baseline` only). Both early-stage, pre–Phase 2 → out of proposal scope.
- Re-enumerate every pass; new loops (e.g. a future `commerce`/`identity`) auto-join.

**Census status (pass 17): EXHAUSTED.** Every own-namespace filename recurring ≥2× has
been examined and dispositioned — further filename-censusing is low-yield until new
subsystems/modules appear. Map:
| filename | owners | verdict |
|---|---|---|
| `api` ×10 | all | Rejected — shared role, divergent state contract |
| `fed`/`federation` | feed/search/mod/acl(+content) | W1 — theme not shape |
| `audit` ×3 | acl/mod/identity | W4 — append-only log → persist/log |
| `page` ×3 | feed/search (pagination) + content (HTML wrapper) | W3 + collision noted |
| `explain` ×2 | acl/mod | W5 — proof tree, substrate-bound |
| `snapshot` ×2 | persist(facet) + content(reinvents) | W7 |
| `wire` ×2 | content(SX serializer) / mod(pipe-format) | Rejected — divergent |
| `schema`,`engine` ×2 | acl/mod | substrate-twin parallels (Datalog vs Prolog); only audit (W4) is liftable |
| `catalog`,`batch` ×2 | commerce/persist, mod/persist | name collisions, unrelated |
| `normalize` ×2 | content(tree-prune)/feed(record-coerce) | name collision (pass 20) |
| `index` ×2 | content(listing)/search(inverted index) | name collision (pass 20) |
| `query` ×3 | content(doc-block)/search(bool AST)/persist(stream-read) | 3-way name collision (pass 20) |
| `store` ×2 | content(on persist) / flow(workflow records) | related concept, divergent |
| `rank` ×2 | feed/search | different domains (activities vs docs), ≤2 |
**acl⇄mod are structural twins** (decision engine over a logic substrate, Datalog vs
Prolog) — they parallel across engine/schema/explain/audit/fed, but only the *audit log*
is substrate-agnostic and liftable (→ W4); the rest are substrate-idiomatic. Next passes:
re-test gates (W2/W3/W8) as consumers mature, watch new modules — not re-census.

**Meta-pattern (pass 20):** new module names keep *recurring* but the operations keep
*colliding* — same noun, domain-specific op (normalize, index, query, catalog, batch,
notify, page, store all proved to be collisions). This is *why* genuine extraction
candidates are rare: the fleet shares vocabulary, not structure. The real shared assets
are the **substrate subsystems** (persist, flow, acl, fed-sx) that app domains *adopt*
(W1/W2/W4/W7/W8), not hand-rolled libs to extract.

**Scanning-method note (learned the hard way, passes 5/12/14/15):** a filename census
for *cross-subsystem* recurrence MUST restrict to each subsystem's OWN namespace —
`X/lib/X/*.sx` — never `X/lib/*/`. The merged substrate libs (`lib/prolog`, `lib/persist`,
`lib/feed`, `lib/datalog`, …) are checked out inside *every* worktree, so a naive census
reports e.g. `query.sx`/`snapshot.sx`/`rank.sx` ×N as phantom recurrences that are really
one merged file copied N times. Correct one-liner:
`for w in <subsystems>; do for f in $w/lib/$w/*.sx; do basename $f .sx; done; done | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn`.

---

## Proposed (cleared the gate)

### A1 · Adopt the shared conformance driver across subsystems
- **Pattern:** every subsystem hand-rolls a near-identical `conformance.sh`
  (epoch-load → eval → scoreboard emit) and an inline `<x>-test name got expected`
  pass/fail counter.
- **Consumers (≥3, overwhelming):** 15 `lib/*/conformance.sh` — `apl, feed, datalog,
  flow, mod, lua, erlang, forth, go, common-lisp, haskell, js, ocaml, prolog,
  smalltalk, tcl`.
- **Home:** `lib/guest` — the one legitimate exception (the shared driver
  `lib/guest/conformance.sh` + `lib/guest/conformance.sx` already exist; modes
  `dict` and `counters`).
- **Status: IN PROGRESS — 6 adopters (pass 7).** `prolog` (dict), `haskell` (counters),
  `apl` (dict), `datalog` (dict), and **`acl` (dict) + `mod` (dict), newly migrated this
  pass** — all 3-line exec shims into `lib/guest/conformance.sh` with a `conformance.conf`.
  **acl + mod are the first *app-domain* adopters** (not language substrates) — strong
  evidence the driver generalizes beyond the substrate layer, which was the open question.
  The `apl` migration earlier *surfaced a latent bug*: the old awk extractor
  under-counted `pipeline` (40 vs the real 152 assertions); true apl total is **562**,
  not 450 — evidence that adopting the driver also improves correctness.
- **Not a target (different harness shape):** `lua/conformance.sh` is a Python runner
  (`lib/lua/conformance.py`) that walks real `*.lua` source files via `lua-eval-ast`
  and classifies pass/fail/timeout — it does not run SX `deftest` suites with a
  counter/dict scoreboard, so the shared driver does not fit. Excluded, not pending.
- **Remaining hand-rolled candidates (~120–220 lines each):** `common-lisp, erlang,
  feed, forth, go, js, ocaml, smalltalk, tcl` — now being worked by the dedicated
  `conformance` loop (above). (`lua` excluded: walks real `*.lua` files via Python.
  `smalltalk` likely excludes too — runs `*.st` via its own `test.sh`. `search` was
  thought to be excluded but DID migrate via counters mode — see the 7-adopter note.)
- **Action:** each remaining subsystem's OWN loop migrates when quiescent — add a
  `conformance.conf` (+ a `test-harness.sx` preload defining its counters) and
  replace `conformance.sh` with the 1-line exec shim
  (`exec bash …/guest/conformance.sh …/conformance.conf "$@"`). Recipe template:
  `lib/haskell/conformance.conf` (counters) or `lib/prolog/conformance.conf` (dict).
  Keep the `bash lib/X/conformance.sh` entry point so no loop is disrupted.
- **Priority: HIGH** (15 consumers, low risk, interface-preserving, additive).
- **8 adopters on architecture** (pass 25): acl, apl, datalog, **events**, haskell, mod,
  prolog, search — `events` migrated via its OWN loop; `search` via counters mode (which
  corrects the earlier "search excluded" note). **+3 on the `loops/conformance` branch:
  `common-lisp` 487/487, `erlang` 761/761, `feed` 189/189** — pending merge to architecture.
  Remaining for the loop: forth, go, js, ocaml, smalltalk(likely-excluded), tcl.
- **NOW IN PROGRESS — dedicated loop (2026-06-07).** A human-triggered `conformance` loop
  (worktree `/root/rose-ash-loops/conformance`, branch `loops/conformance`, tmux session
  `a1-conformance`, briefing `plans/agent-briefings/conformance-loop.md`) is working the
  remaining candidates (common-lisp, erlang, feed, forth, go, js, ocaml, smalltalk, tcl)
  one per iteration, **classify-then-migrate-or-exclude with a hard test-count parity gate**
  (reverts on any mismatch; never pushes to main/architecture). Radar tracks; it implements.
- **Driver-capability boundary found (pass 24, first iteration).** The loop did NOT
  force-migrate `common-lisp` (baseline 305/0 across 12 suites) — the shared driver can't
  reproduce it: `MODE=counters` supports only ONE global pass/fail counter pair + ONE fixed
  preload set, but common-lisp needs **per-suite counter names** (8 distinct pairs) and
  **per-suite preload chains**. It logged a precise blocker + unblock path (extend the
  `SUITES` entry format with optional per-suite counters/preloads) and moved on.
- **Driver gap RESOLVED next iteration (pass 25) — but it touched the shared driver.** The
  loop extended `lib/guest/conformance.sh` (+38 lines: optional per-suite counters + per-suite
  preloads in the `SUITES` format, backward-compatible) and then migrated common-lisp at
  **487/487** (above the 305 baseline — likely another extractor under-count correction, à la
  apl's `pipeline`). The parity gate held throughout.
- **⚠ COORDINATION FLAG (radar): the `loops/conformance` branch now carries a change to the
  SHARED `lib/guest` driver** used by all 8 adopters. It's additive by design, but **before
  this branch merges to `architecture`, re-run the existing adopters' suites under the new
  driver to confirm zero regression** (acl/apl/datalog/events/haskell/mod/prolog/search).
  This is the one cross-cutting risk in an otherwise per-subsystem-isolated effort — surfaced
  here so the merge is gated on adopter-parity, not assumed.

---

## Watching (real but not yet through the gate)

### W1 · Federation scaffold (merge / ingest / backfill / trust-gate)
- **FAILS the structural-identity gate (deep-dived 2026-06-06, all 4 read).** Consumer
  count is met (4) but they are *superficially* similar, not structurally identical —
  the federated unit and merge op differ fundamentally:

  | Subsystem (file) | Federated unit | Merge op | Trust gate | Injected transport |
  |---|---|---|---|---|
  | feed (`fed.sx:14,18,40`) | activity streams | dedupe by `(actor verb object)` | none (visibility via `permit?` separately) | `send-fn`, `fetch-fn` |
  | search (`fed.sx:8`) | inverted indices | relabel DocId `peer*1000+local` + union posting lists | none | none (pure merge fn) |
  | mod (`fed.sx:11-14,99`) | moderation decisions | advisory-list vs applied-list; bind iff `mod/trusted?` | **yes — runtime list** `mod/trusted? peer scope` | mock outbox / `fed-send!` |
  | acl (`federation.sx:43,56`) | Datalog delegate facts | pull facts, gate by `trust`/`level_covers` rule, re-saturate | **yes — Datalog rule** at query time | `transport` dict |
  | events (`federation.sx`) | calendar agendas | fold trusted peers' agendas into one sorted agenda + `:origin` provenance | **yes — runtime list** `ev/trusts?` (peer-id ∈ trust-set) | injected behind `ev/peer-agenda` |

- **The ONLY real commonality is the injection seam** (now 5/5, pass 18), not extractable
  code: every one says "the real transport is `fed-sx`'s job; inject `send-fn`/`fetch-fn`/
  `transport`/`peer-agenda` and mock it in tests." That is an architectural *convention the
  fleet already follows*. The merge op diverges 5 ways (dedupe / index-union / advisory /
  fact-saturation / agenda-sort). The trust gate, where present, splits: **mod + events use
  a runtime trust-set membership check; acl uses a declarative Datalog rule** — so even the
  trust sub-pattern is 2-of-3, and the membership check is a trivial one-liner (below the
  extraction threshold). No shared merge, no single shared trust mechanism.
- **Disposition:** do NOT extract a shared "federation lib." When `fed-sx` ships its
  real transport, these 4 become its *consumers* (wiring `send-fn`/`fetch-fn`/`transport`
  to it) — that work belongs to each subsystem's loop + the `fed-sx` loop, not a
  cross-cutting extraction. Stop re-proposing on the shared name. Home: `fed-sx`.
- **Narrower sub-claim (mod note, pass 6; refined pass 18):** mod asserts the *fed
  trust/outbox* shape shares between mod+acl. Radar evidence refines this: the trust gate
  splits by mechanism, not by subsystem pair — **mod + events** both use a runtime
  trust-set membership check (`mod/trusted?`, `ev/trusts?`), while **acl** uses a Datalog
  rule. So a "trust-set membership" helper has 2 consumers (mod, events) — but it's a
  one-line `member?` and the merge it gates diverges, so still not worth extracting.
  Resolve at the architecture-merge point if a heavier shared trust-set surface emerges.

### W2 · Per-viewer visibility / permission filter
- **2 shipped consumers, same shape** — `filter <injected-permit> <ranked/candidate stream>`:
  - `feed/lib/feed/acl.sx:27` `feed/visible = (feed/filter stream (fn (a) (permit? viewer a)))`,
    capstone at `:34` (stream → ACL → rank → top-N). `permit?` injected, sig `(viewer activity)→bool`.
  - `search/lib/search/fed.sx:16` `aclFilter permit docs = filter permit docs`;
    `topNTfIdfAcl n permit ts idx = take n (aclFilter permit (rankTfIdf ts idx))`.
    `permit` injected, sig `DocId→Bool` (viewer baked in by caller).
- **NOT a consumer:** `mod/lib/mod/policy.sx` is moderation policy (reviewer actions),
  no per-viewer read filter. So mod won't be the 3rd.
- **Missing:** (a) only 2 consumers, need ≥3; (b) the two interfaces *diverge* —
  feed passes `(viewer, item)`, search bakes the viewer in — so any shared form must
  pick a convention; (c) both already **inject** the predicate, and the filter body is
  literally one line (`filter permit xs`). Leaning toward: the predicate's home is
  `acl-on-sx` (`permit?`), and the one-line filter is too thin to extract.
- **Home when ripe:** delegate `permit?` to `acl-on-sx`; do NOT extract the filter.
  Re-check if a 3rd genuine per-viewer read filter ships (e.g. events/commerce).

### W3 · Collection helpers (group-by, dedupe-by-key, stable top-N, distinct-order, offset/limit page)
- feed built all of these on APL primitives. search/commerce/events will want
  group-by / top-N.
- **NEW (2026-06-06): offset/limit pagination shipped in 2 subsystems, identical shape**
  `take limit (drop offset xs)`:
  - `feed/lib/feed/page.sx:9` `feed/page` (offset/limit window over a stream).
  - `search/lib/search/page.sx:9` `paginate off lim docs = take lim (drop off docs)`.
  - NOT a 3rd: `persist/lib/persist/query.sx:5` has a *since-cursor* for incremental log
    consumption — resumable-stream semantics, not result windowing. Different shape.
  - feed *also* has cursor-by-`:at` recency pagination (`page.sx:21-44`); search has no
    cursor. So only the plain offset/limit window is shared, and it is a literal 1-liner.
- **Missing:** ≥3 stable consumers; AND every item here is collection math that belongs
  in the **substrate** (APL/Haskell already expose grade/sort/unique/take/drop), not a
  shared lib. A 1-line `take/drop` window is far below the extraction threshold. Watch;
  revisit only if a non-substrate subsystem needs the same windowing without take/drop.
- **Filename-collision caution (pass 13):** `content/lib/content/page.sx` is an **HTML
  page wrapper** (full HTML5 doc), NOT pagination — do not count it as a 3rd pagination
  consumer. `page.sx` now means two unrelated things across the fleet. Re-tested pass 13:
  pagination still only feed + search (2).

### W4 · In-memory store fakes → `persist-on-sx`
- Not an abstraction to extract — a migration target. Every subsystem fakes its
  store with a mutable list (`feed/-log`, flow store, mod audit, …).
- **Owner:** `persist-on-sx` (in progress). Tracked there, listed here for visibility.
- **Concrete instance (file:line, found pass 4): the append-only decision/audit log.**
  `acl/lib/acl/audit.sx` and `mod/lib/mod/audit.sx` are the SAME hand-rolled shape, and
  `persist/lib/persist/log.sx` (the persist *log facet*) already implements it durably:

  | role | acl/audit.sx | mod/audit.sx | persist/log.sx (target) |
  |---|---|---|---|
  | log var | `acl-audit-log` :9 | `mod/*audit-log*` :10 | backend stream |
  | monotonic seq | `acl-audit-seq` :10 | `mod/*audit-seq*` :11 | per-stream high-water :1 |
  | append (auto-seq) | `acl-audit-decide!` | commit :32 | `persist/append` :17 |
  | count | `acl-audit-count` :51 | `mod/audit-count` :44 | `persist/count` :12 |
  | read-all oldest-first | snapshot/tail :73 | `mod/audit-all` :43 | `persist/read` :29 |
  | read seq≥from | — | by-seq | `persist/read-from` :31 |

  Both deliberately use a monotonic seq with **no wall-clock** (deterministic/testable) —
  identical to persist/log's design. Action when persist's host adapter lands: acl + mod
  loops swap their in-memory log for `persist/log`. 2 consumers today; not a new lib —
  the home already exists. Belongs to acl/mod loops × persist loop, not an extraction.
- **Cross-loop corroboration (pass 6):** the mod loop independently reached the same
  conclusion — `mod/plans/mod-on-sx.md` (commit 538b8a53): *"mod-sx (Prolog) and acl-sx
  (Datalog) converged on the same module shape … only the audit log + fed trust/outbox
  shapes truly share; extract at the architecture-merge point, refactoring both consumers
  atomically, not unilaterally from a loop branch."* Confirms the shape AND the
  do-not-extract-unilaterally stance.
- **Home disagreement to resolve at merge:** mod's note proposes lifting the audit-log
  primitives into **`lib/guest/`**. Radar routing disagrees: a durable append-only log is
  a **`persist-on-sx`** concern (the log facet already exists), not language-impl plumbing.
  Hold the line — `lib/guest` is lexer/parser/AST/HM/test-runner, not an event log.
- **Migration is becoming concrete:** new `host-persist` loop (worktree + tmux, pass 6)
  is building the durable-storage host adapter persist was blocked on — once it lands,
  acl/mod can actually swap to `persist/log`.
- **LIVE REFERENCE EXEMPLAR (pass 9): `content` already does it right.** `content`
  (Phase 2 complete, 162/162) built its op log directly on `persist/log` instead of
  faking it — `content/lib/content/store.sx`: backend injected via `(persist/open)`
  ("content knows nothing about which backend", :10); append op as event
  `persist/append b (content/-stream doc-id) …` (:20); read `persist/read` (:36);
  `persist/last-seq` (:47); **version = replay op stream up to a seq**
  (filter `persist/event-seq ev <= seq`, :61). "The op log is the source of truth …
  the materialised doc is a cache, never primary state."
  This proves the W4 target is real, not hypothetical: acl + mod's hand-rolled
  monotonic-seq logs should adopt exactly content's `persist/log` pattern.
- **Consumer ledger of the append-only monotonic-seq event log (pass 11):**

  | consumer | what | backing | note |
  |---|---|---|---|
  | content (`store.sx`) | doc op log | **persist/log ✓ live** | plain append + replay-to-seq |
  | commerce (`ledger.sx`) | order ledger | **persist/log ✓ live** | `persist/append-once` — idempotent, webhook-replay-safe :40,58 |
  | events (`booking.sx`) | booking roster | **persist/log ✓ live** | `persist/append-expect` — optimistic-concurrency CAS, capacity-safe, lock-free |
  | acl (`audit.sx`) | decision log | in-memory fake (SX) | migrate directly when host adapter lands |
  | mod (`audit.sx`) | decision log | in-memory fake (SX) | migrate directly |
  | identity (`audit.sx`) | grant ledger | in-memory fake (**Erlang**) | `{Seq,Subject,Action}`; needs an **Erlang↔persist bridge** first — author scoped it out until persist lands ("queryable semantics identical") |

- **Two takeaways:** (1) the pattern is **validated across domains** — CRDT doc ops,
  financial orders, event bookings, rule decisions, OAuth grants all reduce to the same
  append-only monotonic-seq stream; (2) migrating to `persist/log` is strictly *better*
  than the fakes — persist exposes a **feature ladder the fakes don't have**:
  `append` (content) → `append-once`/idempotency (commerce) → `append-expect`/optimistic-
  concurrency (events). Every fake would have to reinvent a weaker version of these.
  This is an **adoption** item (the home already exists), NOT a new extraction — owned by
  persist/host-persist × each consumer loop. The SX fakes (acl, mod) migrate directly;
  the Erlang fake (identity) is gated on an Erlang↔persist bridge.

### W5 · Proof-tree explanation over a logic-program derivation
- `acl/lib/acl/explain.sx` (reconstructs a canonical proof by goal-directed search over a
  saturated Datalog db) and `mod/lib/mod/explain.sx` (renders a Prolog-style proof tree
  goal-by-goal with proved/unproved marks + unification bindings) are the same *idea*.
- **Missing / disposition:** only 2 consumers, and they sit on **different substrates**
  (acl→`lib/datalog`, mod→`lib/prolog`). Proof reconstruction/rendering is logic-engine
  machinery → it belongs in each **substrate** (datalog/prolog), not a shared app lib.
  Watch; revisit only if a 3rd logic-backed subsystem reimplements proof explanation.
- **Cross-loop note (pass 6):** mod's note calls `mod/proof-goals` (re-query-each-goal)
  generic and proposes lifting it into **`lib/guest/`**. Radar caveat: proof-tree
  reconstruction *is* engine-agnostic logic machinery, but `lib/guest` is for
  lexer/parser/AST/HM/match/test-runner — a logic-engine proof helper is a poor fit there.
  If genuinely shared by ≥3 engines, a `lib/logic`-style substrate helper is the better
  home than `lib/guest`. Still 2 consumers → stays Watching either way.

---

### W8 · Durable externally-resumed orchestration on `lib/flow` (suspend→host-IO→resume)
- **The shared shape:** a durable `flow` that `request`s an external action (a suspend
  point), the **host** performs the IO, then `flow/resume`s the flow with the outcome;
  flow's deterministic replay means a completed step never re-runs on recovery.
- **Consumers (pass 24): 2 LIVE** (events delivery, commerce order saga).
  - `events/lib/events/notify.sx` (**live**) — reminders/digests as durable flows;
    suspend on delivery `dispatch`, resume with send outcome. At-least-once + idempotency key.
  - `commerce` (**LIVE** as of pass 24 — "order lifecycle as a durable flow-on-sx flow,
    21 tests, Phase 3 done") — order saga `(defflow ordf … (request 'reserve oid) … )`:
    reserve→pay→fulfil as a flow, **payment stays suspended until the payment webhook calls
    `flow/resume`**. Carries only the order-id; pure orchestration over `ledger.sx`.
  - **Now 2 LIVE consumers** of the *same* pattern: long-running process, external resume
    (delivery dispatch vs payment webhook). fed-sx/mod still roll their own outbox (watch
    for convergence). Strengthens "lib/flow is the home"; still adoption, not extraction.
- **Disposition:** `lib/flow` IS the abstraction (events proves it, commerce adopts it) →
  this is an **adoption** observation like W4, NOT an extraction. Home = `lib/flow`.
- **Flow-onboarding friction (light signal):** commerce's note logs real gotchas adopting
  flow — `flow-make-env` returns a large likely-cyclic env (don't print it), env build is
  slow (budget ~540s like flow's own suite). If ≥3 subsystems hit the same onboarding
  gotchas, that's a signal to smooth `lib/flow`'s adopter API — flow's concern, flagged here.
- **Name-collision caveat:** `notify.sx` means two unrelated things — `feed/notify.sx` is
  a *read-side digest* (group inbox by verb+object), NOT delivery. Do not pair them.

### W7 · Snapshot/projection-checkpoint reimplemented vs `persist/snapshot` (delegate)
- `persist/lib/persist/snapshot.sx` already provides a **generic** projection checkpoint:
  store `{:value :seq}` in the kv facet under a namespaced key; the headline property is
  **snapshot + tail == full replay** (pure, clock-free).
- `content/lib/content/snapshot.sx` **reimplements that same pattern on raw persist KV**
  rather than delegating: `persist/kv-put b (content/-snap-key doc-id) {:doc … :seq seq}`
  (:20), `persist/kv-has?`/`kv-get` (:27-28), and its own tail-replay (:53-59). It never
  calls `persist/snapshot-*`. content's doc-materialisation *is* a projection fold over
  its op stream — exactly what `persist/snapshot` checkpoints generically.
- **Disposition:** persist-adoption nudge (like W4): content could delegate to
  `persist/snapshot` (its projection = "fold ops → doc"), dropping the duplicated
  KV+replay code. Home already exists → NOT an extraction; owned by content × persist
  loops. Only 1 reinventor today; watch whether commerce/events/identity also hand-roll a
  snapshot on raw KV instead of using the facet (would strengthen the nudge). NB timeline:
  unclear if `persist/snapshot` predated content's — flag, don't blame.

### W6 · Guarded lifecycle state machine (illegal transition = explicit error)
- Recurs as a **design principle**, NOT a shared structure (found pass 10):
  - `mod/lib/mod/lifecycle.sx` — pure SX: immutable case `{:state :error :history …}`,
    explicit transition table `mod/lc-transitions` (:31), illegal transition returns the
    case unchanged with `:error` set. States open→triaged→decided→appealed→final.
  - `identity/lib/identity/membership.sx` — an **Erlang `gen_server`** fragment (identity
    runs on erlang-on-sx): a `receive` loop with `case find(...) of … {error, St}` guards.
    States none→pending→active→lapsed→revoked.
- **Both share the guideline** ("invalid transitions are explicit errors, never silent
  no-ops") but **implement it substrate-idiomatically** — SX transition-table over
  immutable values vs an Erlang process loop with per-message case guards. Same W1/`api.sx`
  trap: shared *idea*, divergent *structure*.
- **Disposition:** not an extraction target — the FSM mechanism is ~10 substrate-specific
  lines; the value is in each domain's state graph, not the plumbing. At most a **design
  guideline** ("model lifecycle as a guarded FSM with explicit-error transitions"). Watch
  whether commerce-checkout / events-booking add their own — if so it confirms the
  *guideline*, still not a lib. Do not propose extracting a shared state-machine lib.

## Rejected (considered, declined — do not re-propose)

- **"Continuous auto-implementing abstractor loop."** Rejected at design time: an
  agent writing across `lib/<x>/**` breaks the worktree isolation that makes the
  fleet safe, and is rewarded for manufacturing premature/wrong abstractions. The
  radar is read-only by design. (This file is the alternative.)
- **Shared `api.sx` "public boundary" module (×6).** Rejected pass 4-5: every subsystem
  has an `api.sx` (acl, feed, flow, mod, persist, search — a 100% filename match), but it
  is a naming *convention for the public entry point*, not a shared structure. They
  disagree on the most basic contract: acl/feed use **implicit module state**
  (`acl/api.sx` "implicit current db", `feed/api.sx` "single mutable log") while
  `persist/api.sx` threads an **explicit backend as every call's first arg**; flow's api
  *builds a Scheme env*, search's api *concatenates a Haskell source string*, mod's is a
  *lifecycle state-machine façade* (17 defs vs persist's 1). Same role, no common shape —
  the W1 coincidental-resemblance trap. Do not re-propose on the filename.
- **Shared `wire.sx` "serialization" module (×2).** Rejected pass 15: content + mod both
  have a `wire.sx`, but `content/wire.sx` uses the **generic SX serializer**
  (`serialize`/`parse`, full-fidelity round-trip) while `mod/wire.sx` is a **bespoke
  versioned pipe-delimited line** (subset of fields, `split` hand-built over slice/len
  because mod's Prolog-loaded env strips string prims). Shared role (wire format),
  divergent structure + substrate constraint → not a candidate; the SX serializer is
  already the shared tool for SX-substrate subsystems, and mod can't use it. (Same family
  as the `api.sx` rejection above.)
- **Dumping app-domain plumbing into `lib/guest`.** Rejected: `lib/guest` is for
  language-implementation plumbing. App patterns route to acl/fed-sx/persist/
  substrate/host instead (see the routing rule in the briefing).
